<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ideas Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/</link>
	<description>Web 2.0 to Government 2.0 in Ireland  ---  e-Government and e-Democracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>david fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Split all of the debt according to its basis .i all development debt put into one vehicle. Take all of the security used to secure this debt into the same vehicle. Each developer would be allowed to keep a limited portion of their assets if they give complete cooperation. 

get a team of Architechts , engimeers and business people to run this group. 

Allow this group to borrow to work through all of the different sites and all of the profits from thwe developments be used to repay the debt at whatever rate

make sure that the plannig in all cases can be fast tracked on the basis that a good return on these assets will reduce the exposure for the state

this could be done over say ten years and i believe this group could make a substantial profit. 

Any developer wishing to take advantage of this scheme must assist with  site plans and any other expertise etc in order to avoid being made completely bankrupt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Split all of the debt according to its basis .i all development debt put into one vehicle. Take all of the security used to secure this debt into the same vehicle. Each developer would be allowed to keep a limited portion of their assets if they give complete cooperation. </p>
<p>get a team of Architechts , engimeers and business people to run this group. </p>
<p>Allow this group to borrow to work through all of the different sites and all of the profits from thwe developments be used to repay the debt at whatever rate</p>
<p>make sure that the plannig in all cases can be fast tracked on the basis that a good return on these assets will reduce the exposure for the state</p>
<p>this could be done over say ten years and i believe this group could make a substantial profit. </p>
<p>Any developer wishing to take advantage of this scheme must assist with  site plans and any other expertise etc in order to avoid being made completely bankrupt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>The Ideas campaign is now trying to explain the intentions of its T&amp;C http://www.ideascampaign.ie/no-need-for-warning-on-private-ideas/ when in fact if they enabled comments on their wordpress site, they would instantly reassure people that the process is transparent. The fact that they have no mechanism at all for public feedback is in fact the antithesis of social media..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ideas campaign is now trying to explain the intentions of its T&amp;C <a href="http://www.ideascampaign.ie/no-need-for-warning-on-private-ideas/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ideascampaign.ie/no-need-for-warning-on-private-ideas/</a> when in fact if they enabled comments on their wordpress site, they would instantly reassure people that the process is transparent. The fact that they have no mechanism at all for public feedback is in fact the antithesis of social media..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>See also some more debate around the same themes here: http://www.valueireland.com/2009/03/im-still-not-convinced-by-the-ideascampaign/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See also some more debate around the same themes here: <a href="http://www.valueireland.com/2009/03/im-still-not-convinced-by-the-ideascampaign/" rel="nofollow">http://www.valueireland.com/2009/03/im-still-not-convinced-by-the-ideascampaign/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rialtas.net/blog/2009/03/12/the-ideas-campaign/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>you can see here the lack of trust engendered by keeping all the contributions &#039;private&#039;  in addition to a legalistic and off-putting &#039;Terms and conditions&#039;. http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/03/06/ideas-campaign/


If all ideas submit to the site were visible, and were debated and commented on &#039;in the open&#039; online those who originated ideas would be recognised and fears about lack of transparency and the Ideas Campaign organisation&#039;s &#039;motivations&#039; would be diminished..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can see here the lack of trust engendered by keeping all the contributions &#8216;private&#8217;  in addition to a legalistic and off-putting &#8216;Terms and conditions&#8217;. <a href="http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/03/06/ideas-campaign/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gavinsblog.com/2009/03/06/ideas-campaign/</a></p>
<p>If all ideas submit to the site were visible, and were debated and commented on &#8216;in the open&#8217; online those who originated ideas would be recognised and fears about lack of transparency and the Ideas Campaign organisation&#8217;s &#8216;motivations&#8217; would be diminished..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
